All answers

Question Answer Description Datasource and Evidence Comment
Is there a clear statement of the assessment and categorisation of informal settlements? Partial Evidence

The HDA has developed guidelines to assess informal settlements. The following categories are used: A: Full upgrade - consisting of full services, top-structures and formal tenure B1: Interim basic services - where/full upgradingis feasible but not imminent B2: Emergency basic services - Where full upgrading is not viable or appropriate C: Relocations - Where there are urgent health or safety threats

IDP/ BEPP 2016/17 review "Full upgrade (A): 8% Interim services (B1): 50% Emergency services (B2): 0% Relocation (C): 42% "
# of people living in informal settlements Strong Evidence

By multiplying the number of households with the city's average household size according to census 2011 data, we get a sense of how many people live in informal settlements

BEPP 2018/19 review 155 080
Annual IS growth rate Strong Evidence

The growth rate of informal settlements is calculated by comparing census 2001 and 2011 data.

Census 2011 1%
How many houses are delivered per annum? Strong Evidence

Knowing the annual housing delivery rate will provide evidence of whether the city government can meet the needs of informal settlements through the conventional housing programme.

IDP/ BEPP 2018/2019 review 527 units per annum
Is there a clear indication of the extent of housing demand/ backlog? Strong Evidence

It is important to know if the city government is prioritising housing as a response to informal settlements.

IDP/ BEPP 2018/2019 review "47 000 households"
Has a systematic assessment and categorisation of informal settlements been carried out? Partial Evidence

HDA guidelines recommend that city governments conduct a rapid assessment and categorisation of informal settlements.

IDP/ BEPP 2016/17 review Informal Settlements Development Matrix
Is the essence of the upgrading strategy upfront apparent? Partial Evidence

Every strategy should be clearly state, without ambiguity and uncertainty, what the city's strategy of upgrading informal settlements is. In this way, citizens can hold their governments to account.

IDP/BEPP 2018/19 review The strategy indicates that incremental upgrading and sites and service is preferred. However, this is never presented as a coherent whole, but rather isolated sections on what will be done.
# HH living in informal settlements Strong Evidence

The number of households residing in informal settlements across the entire city.

BEPP 2018/19 review 41 238
# of IS (smallest unit defined) Strong Evidence

Informal settlements are differently defined by cities, and are sometimes called settlements, pockets, or clusters. The number presented here is the smallest measurable unit.

BEPP 2018/19 review 154 - 156
Has a department been assigned to take responsibility for the strategy? Partial Evidence

A leading department needs to take responsibility for the strategy.

IDP/BEPP 2018/19 review Department of Human Settlements
% of Provincial total Strong Evidence

This figure indicates that 41% of informal settlements in the Eastern Cape Province is located in East London.

HDA Report, 2013 41%
% of municipal population Strong Evidence

This figure represents the proportion of the city's population living in informal settlements. In other words, one in ten people live in an informal settlement.

Census 2011 17%
Does the council have an official informal settlements upgrading strategy? Partial Evidence

Every city should have an informal settlement upgrading strategy articulated in their core municipal doucmentation.

IDP/BEPP 2018/19 review Integrated Sustainable Human Settlement Plan (ISHSP) is presently under review
Is the city council's adopted strategy an appropriate response to the scale of informality? Partial Evidence

This indicator is a qualitative assessment by Isandla Institute when taking into account the nature of the upgrading strategy.

The strategy responds to the scale of informality. However, insufficient detail is provided. Qualitative assessment
Timeframe to eradicate backlog conventionally (years) Strong Evidence

This indicator seeks to understand if the city government can realistically deliver each informal settlement household a house in a reasonable (<15 years) time period

IDP/ BEPP 2018/2019 review 230 years
Is there a clear breakdown of budgets reserved for informal settlement upgrading in the city's capital budget? No Evidence

City governments should clearly indicate the proportion of capital budgets, like the Urban Settlements Development Grant, is reserved for informal settlement upgrading.

IDP 2018/2019 review Budgets do not indicate expenditure on informal settlement upgrading.
Is the rapid assessment and categorisation an appropriate response to the nature and extent of informality? Partial Evidence

Determining the appropriateness of the city government's assessment and categorisation is a qualitative appraisal by Isandla Institute

IDP/ BEPP 2016/17 review Strong preference for housing and relocations.
What percentage of municipal capital budget is reserved for upgrading informal settlements? No Evidence

City governments should clearly indicate the proportion of capital budgets, like the Urban Settlements Development Grant, is reserved for informal settlement upgrading.

IDP 2018/2019 review This is not presented in the documentation
Does the budget align with the municipal targets for upgrading informal settlements? No Evidence

There should be a clear alignment between the strategy and the budgets allocated to implement that strategy.

IDP 2018/2019 review N/A

Meta data

Date the data became available   Unknown
Format of data   Unknown
Reviewer   Isandla Institute
Submitters   Isandla Institute
Last modified   Thu Oct 25 2018 12:33:02 GMT+0000 (UTC)