| Question | Answer | Description | Datasource and Evidence | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the city government likely to reach its delivery targets this year? | Partial Evidence | The likelihood of reaching targets is determined by calculating the expenditure |
Previous data collection: Annual Budget 2022/23 | |
| Does the expenditure align with the budget and delivery target for the previous year? | No Evidence | What is the percentage of actual expenditure vs. budgetted expenditure, against the annual target? |
Previous data collection: Annual Budget 2022/23 | |
| Is there an indication that NUSP (Department of Human Settlements) technical support to the city have been incorporated into planning? | Strong Evidence | NUSP/HDA technical support was provided to all cities (and many other municipalities). |
BEPP 2023/24, IDP 2021-2026 (23/24 review) | |
| Are projects prioritised according to NUSP technical support? | Strong Evidence | There is a high likelihood that NUSP technical support to prioritised projects resulted in more detailed planning, and needs to be incorporated. |
BEPP 2023/24, IDP 2021-2026 (23/24 review) | |
| Are the specific settlements identified? | Strong Evidence | Identifying prioritised settlements indicates the city government is making progress. |
BEPP 2023/24, IDP 2021-2026 (23/24 review) | |
| MSTF annual target | Partial Evidence | What is the annual target to upgrade settlements to Phase 3? |
IDP 2021-2026 (24/25 review), BEPP 2024/25 | |
| Is there a breakdown of progress towards upgrading informal settlements to Phase 3? | Partial Evidence | Is there evidence that the city is reporting on incremental developments? |
IDP 2021-2026 (24/25 review), BEPP 2024/25 | |
| Does the strategy mention national government / MTREF targets towards 2024? | Partial Evidence | In 2019 the National Department of Human Settlements committed to upgrade 1 500 informal settlements. Does the city take these targets into account? |
IDP 2021-2026 (24/25 review), BEPP 2024/25 |