Score: 70

All answers

Question Answer Description Datasource and Evidence Comment
Is there a clear breakdown of budgets reserved for informal settlement upgrading in the city's capital budget? Partial Evidence

City governments should clearly indicate the proportion of capital budgets, like the Urban Settlements Development Grant, is reserved for informal settlement upgrading.

IDP 2020/21, MSDF 2017/18 - 2020/21 Budget indicate expenditure on informal settlement upgrading.
Does the budget align with the municipal targets for upgrading informal settlements? Partial Evidence

There should be a clear alignment between the strategy and the budgets allocated to implement that strategy.

IDP 2020/21, MSDF 2017/18 - 2020/21 No clear indication
What percentage of municipal capital budget is reserved for upgrading informal settlements? Partial Evidence

City governments should clearly indicate the proportion of capital budgets, like the Urban Settlements Development Grant, is reserved for informal settlement upgrading.

IDP 2020/21, MSDF 2017/18 - 2020/21 Approximately R2,888,050,000
Is there a clear statement of the assessment and categorisation of informal settlements? Strong Evidence

The HDA has developed guidelines to assess informal settlements. The following categories are used: A: Full upgrade - consisting of full services, top-structures and formal tenure B1: Interim basic services - where/full upgradingis feasible but not imminent B2: Emergency basic services - Where full upgrading is not viable or appropriate C: Relocations - Where there are urgent health or safety threats

IDP 2020/21, MSDF 2017/18 - 2020/21 A - 63, B1 - 342, B2 - 118, C - 27
Is the rapid assessment and categorisation an appropriate response to the nature and extent of informality? Partial Evidence

Determining the appropriateness of the city government's assessment and categorisation is a qualitative appraisal by Isandla Institute

IDP 2020/21, MSDF 2017/18 - 2020/21 No specific indication
Has a systematic assessment and categorisation of informal settlements been carried out? Strong Evidence

HDA guidelines recommend that city governments conduct a rapid assessment and categorisation of informal settlements.

IDP 2020/21, MSDF 2017/18 - 2020/21 Yes, in complince with the NUSP
Does the council have an official informal settlements upgrading strategy? Strong Evidence

Every city should have an informal settlement upgrading strategy articulated in their core municipal doucmentation.

IDP 2020/21, MSDF 2017/18 - 2020/21 New Approach to Informal Settlements
Is the city council's adopted strategy appropriate response to the scale of informality? Partial Evidence

This indicator is a qualitative assessment by Isandla Institute when taking into account the nature of the upgrading strategy.

IDP 2020/21, MSDF 2017/18 - 2020/21 The strategy responds to the scale of informality, with limitations and lags identified.
Is the essence of the upgrading strategy upfront apparent? Strong Evidence

Every strategy should be clearly state, without ambiguity and uncertainty, what the city's strategy of upgrading informal settlements is. In this way, citizens can hold their governments to account.

IDP 2020/21, MSDF 2017/18 - 2020/21 Yes, through elevating informal settlements is identified as a strategic municipal priority
Has a department been assigned to take responsibility for the strategy? Strong Evidence

A leading department needs to take responsibility for the strategy.

IDP 2020/21, MSDF 2017/18 - 2020/21 Department of Human Settlements
Is there a clear indication of the extent of housing demand/ backlog? Strong Evidence

It is important to know if the city government is prioritising housing as a response to informal settlements.

IDP 2020/21, MSDF 2017/18 - 2020/21 440000
How many houses are delivered per annum? No Evidence

Knowing the annual housing delivery rate will provide evidence of whether the city government can meet the needs of informal settlements through the conventional housing programme.

IDP 2020/21, MSDF 2017/18 - 2020/21 No clear indication
Timeframe to eradicate backlog conventionally (years) Strong Evidence

This indicator seeks to understand if the city government can realistically deliver each informal settlement household a house in a reasonable (<15 years) time period

IDP 2020/21, MSDF 2017/18 - 2020/21 30 years
# HH living in informal settlements Strong Evidence

The number of households residing in informal settlements across the entire city.

MSDF 2016/17 - 2020/21 287 000
# of IS (smallest unit defined) Strong Evidence

Informal settlements are differently defined by cities, and are sometimes called settlements, pockets, or clusters. The number presented here is the smallest measurable unit.

MSDF 2016/17 - 2020/21 581
Annual IS growth rate Partial Evidence

The growth rate of informal settlements is calculated by comparing census 2001 and 2011 data.

MSDF 2016/17 - 2020/21 1%
% of municipal population Partial Evidence

This figure represents the proportion of the city's population living in informal settlements. In other words, one in ten people live in an informal settlement.

MSDF 2016/17 - 2020/21 25%
% of Provincial total Partial Evidence

This figure indicates that 41% of informal settlements in the Eastern Cape Province is located in East London.

MSDF 2016/17 - 2020/21 75%
# of people living in informal settlements Strong Evidence

By multiplying the number of households with the city's average household size according to census 2011 data, we get a sense of how many people live in informal settlements

MSDF 2016/17 - 2020/21 986 755

Meta data

Date the data became available   Unknown
Format of data   Unknown
Reviewer   Urban Programmeand L
Submitters   Urban Programmeand L
Last modified   Tue Jun 01 2021 13:30:15 GMT+0000 (UTC)